REGISTER

Zero To Hide

  • Instant Withdrawals
  • VIP Transfer
  • Instant Rakeback
  • Weekly Cashback up to 35%

CS2 World Rankings 2026 — Top Teams

30 teams

The top 30 Counter-Strike 2 teams ranked by performance over the last 90 days. Our ranking weights three signals: 3-month win rate against tracked opposition, average roster rating across the active lineup, and match volume in S-tier and A-tier tournaments. Updated every match. The free HLTV-style rankings table for fans, analysts and prop bettors.

The top 3 CS2 teams in 2026 are Vitality, Team Falcons, Spirit Top of the rankings: Vitality with a 95.2% win rate and 1.25 avg rating across 21 tracked matches.

Top 30 CS2 Teams (Last 90 Days)

  1. #1 Vitality
    Vitality 20W-1L · 1.25 avg rating
    95.2%
  2. #2 Team Falcons
    Team Falcons 11W-4L · 1.20 avg rating
    73.3%
  3. #3 Spirit
    Spirit 11W-5L · 1.16 avg rating
    68.8%
  4. #4 Natus Vincere
    Natus Vincere 19W-9L · 1.12 avg rating
    67.9%
  5. #5 TheMongolz
    TheMongolz 16W-9L · 1.06 avg rating
    64.0%
  6. #6 FUT Esports
    FUT Esports 15W-9L · 1.12 avg rating
    62.5%
  7. #7 Astralis
    Astralis 16W-10L · 1.12 avg rating
    61.5%
  8. #8 MOUZ
    MOUZ 11W-7L · 1.09 avg rating
    61.1%
  9. #9 MIBR
    MIBR 3W-2L · 1.08 avg rating
    60.0%
  10. #10 Aurora Gaming
    Aurora Gaming 13W-10L · 1.07 avg rating
    56.5%
  11. #11 Legacy
    Legacy 8W-7L · 1.10 avg rating
    53.3%
  12. #12 PARIVISION
    PARIVISION 13W-12L · 1.02 avg rating
    52.0%
  13. #13 FURIA
    FURIA 11W-11L · 1.09 avg rating
    50.0%
  14. #14 9z
    9z 2W-2L · 1.05 avg rating
    50.0%
  15. #15 GamerLegion
    GamerLegion 2W-2L · 0.99 avg rating
    50.0%
  16. #16 G2
    G2 11W-12L · 1.11 avg rating
    47.8%
  17. #17 3DMAX
    3DMAX 10W-13L · 1.04 avg rating
    43.5%
  18. #18 FOKUS
    FOKUS 2W-3L · 1.11 avg rating
    40.0%
  19. #19 EYEBALLERS
    EYEBALLERS 2W-3L · 1.01 avg rating
    40.0%
  20. #20 Heroic
    Heroic 5W-8L · 1.09 avg rating
    38.5%
  21. #21 Monte
    Monte 3W-5L · 0.99 avg rating
    37.5%
  22. #22 paiN
    paiN 4W-7L · 0.98 avg rating
    36.4%
  23. #23 TYLOO
    TYLOO 1W-2L · 0.94 avg rating
    33.3%
  24. #24 HOTU
    HOTU 1W-2L · 1.01 avg rating
    33.3%
  25. #25 RED Canids
    RED Canids 1W-2L · 0.89 avg rating
    33.3%
  26. #26 B8
    B8 6W-13L · 1.01 avg rating
    31.6%
  27. #27 Liquid
    Liquid 3W-7L · 0.99 avg rating
    30.0%
  28. #28 NIP
    NIP 2W-5L · 1.07 avg rating
    28.6%
  29. #29 FaZe
    FaZe 4W-11L · 1.01 avg rating
    26.7%
  30. #30 Gaimin Gladiators
    Gaimin Gladiators 1W-3L · 0.93 avg rating
    25.0%

How Our CS2 Rankings Are Calculated

Our ranking is built from three components, all derived from observable match data over the last 90 days. We don't use organizational tier, social media following or commercial value — only what teams actually do on the server.

Component 1: Win rate against tracked opposition (50% weight)

Total maps won divided by maps played in S-tier and A-tier tournaments only. We exclude online qualifiers and showmatches because those don't predict performance against tier-1 opposition. A team going 80-20 against weak online opponents will rank lower than one going 25-15 against actual top-30 sides.

Component 2: Average roster rating (30% weight)

The mean of every active player's career rating, averaged across the lineup. This rewards teams that field consistently strong individuals and penalizes lineups that rely on one star plus four mediocre players. Roster ratings update as players' individual sample sizes grow, so newer rosters stabilize over their first 4–6 weeks of play.

Component 3: Match volume (20% weight)

Teams need a minimum of 3 finished matches in the last 90 days to appear. Beyond that floor, more matches against quality opposition slightly boosts ranking — a team that played 40 tier-1 matches has a more reliable ranking signal than one with 8. We cap the boost at the 30-match mark to prevent volume-padding through low-quality scrims.

What we don't include

Tournament wins, prize money, age of the organization, regional dominance — none of these change the ranking. They might be why you remember a team, but they don't predict whether the team wins their next match. The whole point of a ranking is forward-looking signal, not retrospective reputation.

Comparison to HLTV rankings

HLTV's official ranking weights more historical context (LAN performance, big-event finals) and runs on a longer timeframe. Our ranking is shorter-window and more form-driven. Both are useful for different purposes — HLTV for long-term team evaluation, our ranking for "who's playing best right now" decisions like player props and short-term match picks.

CS2 Rankings FAQ

How often are CS2 rankings updated?

The rankings refresh every 30 minutes during active match days. Each finished match feeds new win/loss data into the system, individual player ratings recompute, and the next page render reflects the new positions. Major events (Majors, IEM finals) trigger faster recomputation as those matches carry heavier weight in the ranking signal.

Why isn't my favorite team ranked?

To appear in the rankings, a team needs to have played at least 3 finished matches in the last 90 days in tracked competitions. Teams that are between rosters, on hiatus, or only competing in untracked online events won't show up. Once they play their next matches in S-tier or A-tier opposition, they'll re-enter the ranking.

Are these CS2 rankings the same as HLTV's rankings?

No. HLTV maintains its own official global ranking with proprietary weighting that emphasizes LAN performance, recent major-event finals and longer historical context. Our ranking uses a shorter 90-day window and weights win rate, roster rating and match volume only. Both are useful — HLTV for long-term team evaluation, ours for "who's in form right now" decisions like player props and short-term betting picks.

Why does win rate matter more than tournament wins?

Tournament wins are concentrated outcomes that depend heavily on bracket luck — a team can win a $1M event by beating one in-form opponent in a single best-of-five and lose four group matches before that. Win rate across 90 days against quality opposition is a much more reliable predictor of how a team will perform in any given upcoming match, which is what most users want a ranking for.

What's a good roster rating?

1.10+ is elite tier — the top-3 teams in our rankings typically average between 1.12 and 1.20 across their lineup. 0.95–1.10 is solid mid-tier territory, where teams are competitive against most opponents but rarely favorites against the best. Below 0.90 means the lineup is collectively underperforming — usually a team in transition, with new pieces, or in a slump that hasn't broken yet.

Do the rankings predict who wins specific matches?

Imperfectly, but better than not using them. Higher-ranked teams win more often against lower-ranked teams, and the gap in ranking points correlates roughly with win probability — a #5 team beats a #25 team about 70% of the time, while a #5 vs #6 matchup is closer to a coinflip. For specific match picks we recommend cross-referencing rankings with our individual match predictions and PrizePicks projections rather than relying on the ranking alone.