Complexity vs MIBR — CS2 Match BO3 at Group B
Map Results (2 maps)
Complexity
🏆 16
MIBR
2
Complexity ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poizon | 20 | 6 | 8 | 140.6 | 15% | 2.17 | 100.0% |
| blameF | 17 | 3 | 2 | 84.7 | 35.3% | 1.65 | 88.9% |
| k0nfig | 17 | 9 | 4 | 95.1 | 52.9% | 1.58 | 88.9% |
| RUSH | 15 | 7 | 4 | 89.2 | 33.3% | 1.48 | 88.9% |
| oBo | 15 | 8 | 4 | 71.9 | 60% | 1.47 | 88.9% |
| meyern | 14 | 17 | 1 | 76.3 | 50% | 0.81 | 61.1% |
| TACO | 6 | 17 | 0 | 40.7 | — | 0.37 | 33.3% |
| FalleN | 5 | 16 | 0 | 25.8 | 60% | 0.36 | 50.0% |
| kNgV- | 4 | 17 | 5 | 48.8 | 75% | 0.34 | 38.9% |
| fer | 4 | 17 | 0 | 40.4 | 100% | 0.32 | 44.4% |
MIBR ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
Complexity
🏆 16
MIBR
9
Complexity ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k0nfig | 30 | 17 | 3 | 115.2 | 56.7% | 1.78 | 88.0% |
| oBo | 18 | 16 | 7 | 92.9 | 50% | 1.42 | 76.0% |
| poizon | 21 | 14 | 8 | 90.3 | 33.3% | 1.38 | 80.0% |
| meyern | 20 | 16 | 4 | 84.6 | 65% | 1.17 | 60.0% |
| RUSH | 16 | 13 | 2 | 66.4 | 68.8% | 1.04 | 72.0% |
| FalleN | 18 | 18 | 4 | 72.7 | 16.7% | 1.01 | 60.0% |
| TACO | 13 | 18 | 6 | 69.2 | 76.9% | 0.85 | 64.0% |
| blameF | 7 | 14 | 8 | 43.9 | 42.9% | 0.76 | 72.0% |
| kNgV- | 14 | 20 | 5 | 56.1 | 42.9% | 0.74 | 60.0% |
| fer | 9 | 20 | 2 | 51.0 | 66.7% | 0.53 | 52.0% |
MIBR ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
Full Match Statistics
Complexity
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
poizon |
2 | 41 | 20 | 16 | 2.05 | 115.5 | 24% | 0 | 90% | 1.78 |
k0nfig |
2 | 47 | 26 | 7 | 1.81 | 105.2 | 55% | 0 | 88.5% | 1.68 |
oBo |
2 | 33 | 24 | 11 | 1.38 | 82.4 | 55% | 0 | 82.5% | 1.45 |
RUSH |
2 | 31 | 20 | 6 | 1.55 | 77.8 | 52% | 0 | 80.5% | 1.26 |
blameF |
2 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 1.41 | 64.3 | 38% | 0 | 80.5% | 1.21 |
meyern |
2 | 34 | 33 | 5 | 1.03 | 80.5 | 59% | 0 | 60.6% | 0.99 |
FalleN |
2 | 23 | 34 | 4 | 0.68 | 49.3 | 26% | 0 | 55% | 0.69 |
TACO |
2 | 19 | 35 | 6 | 0.54 | 55 | 53% | 0 | 48.7% | 0.61 |
kNgV- |
2 | 18 | 37 | 10 | 0.49 | 52.5 | 50% | 0 | 49.5% | 0.54 |
fer |
2 | 13 | 37 | 2 | 0.35 | 45.7 | 77% | 0 | 48.2% | 0.43 |
MIBR
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
Roster not available — view team
Head-to-Head
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the score of Complexity vs MIBR?
The final score of Complexity vs MIBR was 2-0.
What format is Complexity vs MIBR?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Group B.
Where can I watch Complexity vs MIBR live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for Complexity vs MIBR?
In recent head-to-head matchups, Complexity has won 3 and MIBR has won 5 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: Complexity vs MIBR
Complexity defeated MIBR with a score of 2-0 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at DreamHack Open — Group B on February 23, 2020.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, Complexity has taken 3 of their last 8 meetings while MIBR has claimed 5.
This page provides complete coverage of the Complexity vs MIBR BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
