G2 vs FURIA — CS2 Match BO3 at Group B
Match summary: G2 vs FURIA
G2 defeated FURIA 2-1 (Map 16-13, Map 13-16, Map 16-10) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Group B on February 20, 2022.
Map Results (3 maps)
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiKo | 29 | 17 | 4 | 105.6 | 62.1% | 1.68 | 86.2% |
| JACKZ | 23 | 19 | 5 | 83.8 | 47.8% | 1.21 | 75.9% |
| arT | 24 | 22 | 3 | 84.3 | 58.3% | 1.06 | 58.6% |
| huNter- | 18 | 17 | 2 | 68.7 | 61.1% | 1.02 | 69.0% |
| m0NESY | 17 | 16 | 4 | 53.9 | 29.4% | 1.00 | 75.9% |
| yuurih | 18 | 19 | 3 | 67.4 | 33.3% | 0.99 | 69.0% |
| KSCERATO | 16 | 18 | 5 | 67.2 | 56.3% | 0.93 | 65.5% |
| saffee | 17 | 18 | 3 | 56.9 | 17.6% | 0.89 | 65.5% |
| drop | 14 | 22 | 4 | 63.1 | 50% | 0.77 | 62.1% |
| Aleksib | 11 | 20 | 2 | 54.9 | 27.3% | 0.71 | 69.0% |
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| saffee | 23 | 16 | 2 | 78.0 | 17.4% | 1.30 | 75.9% |
| Aleksib | 22 | 18 | 7 | 93.0 | 54.5% | 1.23 | 79.3% |
| KSCERATO | 22 | 19 | 5 | 80.6 | 40.9% | 1.23 | 79.3% |
| NiKo | 24 | 20 | 2 | 87.5 | 54.2% | 1.16 | 62.1% |
| arT | 20 | 24 | 5 | 91.5 | 45% | 1.11 | 75.9% |
| yuurih | 20 | 17 | 1 | 69.6 | 55% | 0.97 | 58.6% |
| huNter- | 17 | 23 | 4 | 80.7 | 58.8% | 0.81 | 58.6% |
| drop | 15 | 15 | 1 | 41.9 | 33.3% | 0.81 | 69.0% |
| m0NESY | 15 | 19 | 2 | 38.9 | 33.3% | 0.76 | 65.5% |
| JACKZ | 13 | 22 | 5 | 59.5 | 46.2% | 0.70 | 58.6% |
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiKo | 27 | 16 | 6 | 109.9 | 55.6% | 1.50 | 76.9% |
| KSCERATO | 24 | 18 | 4 | 100.2 | 58.3% | 1.35 | 76.9% |
| m0NESY | 19 | 13 | 2 | 72.2 | 31.6% | 1.29 | 73.1% |
| huNter- | 15 | 14 | 6 | 69.3 | 33.3% | 1.12 | 69.2% |
| Aleksib | 16 | 16 | 7 | 67.1 | 31.3% | 0.99 | 65.4% |
| yuurih | 16 | 15 | 2 | 65.3 | 37.5% | 0.98 | 76.9% |
| JACKZ | 11 | 17 | 7 | 51.2 | 54.5% | 0.95 | 80.8% |
| drop | 14 | 20 | 3 | 74.5 | 35.7% | 0.85 | 53.8% |
| saffee | 12 | 16 | 3 | 57.8 | 50% | 0.83 | 65.4% |
| arT | 10 | 19 | 5 | 48.3 | 30% | 0.64 | 53.8% |
Full Match Statistics
G2
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 80 | 53 | 12 | 1.51 | 101 | 58% | 0 | 75.1% | 1.45 |
|
|
3 | 62 | 55 | 14 | 1.13 | 82.7 | 52% | 0 | 73.9% | 1.17 |
|
|
3 | 51 | 48 | 8 | 1.06 | 55 | 31% | 0 | 71.5% | 1.02 |
|
|
3 | 52 | 50 | 8 | 1.04 | 64.2 | 25% | 0 | 68.9% | 1.01 |
|
|
3 | 50 | 54 | 12 | 0.93 | 72.9 | 52% | 0 | 65.6% | 0.98 |
|
|
3 | 54 | 51 | 6 | 1.06 | 67.4 | 43% | 0 | 68.2% | 0.98 |
|
|
3 | 49 | 54 | 16 | 0.91 | 71.7 | 41% | 0 | 71.2% | 0.98 |
|
|
3 | 47 | 58 | 17 | 0.81 | 64.8 | 49% | 0 | 71.8% | 0.95 |
|
|
3 | 54 | 65 | 13 | 0.83 | 74.7 | 48% | 0 | 62.8% | 0.94 |
|
|
3 | 43 | 57 | 8 | 0.75 | 59.8 | 40% | 0 | 61.6% | 0.81 |
FURIA
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent G2 vs FURIA head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Stage 3Frequently Asked Questions
What is the score of G2 vs FURIA?
The final score of G2 vs FURIA was 2-1.
What format is G2 vs FURIA?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Group B.
Where can I watch G2 vs FURIA live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for G2 vs FURIA?
In recent head-to-head matchups, G2 has won 4 and FURIA has won 4 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: G2 vs FURIA
G2 defeated FURIA with a score of 2-1 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at IEM — Group B on February 20, 2022.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, G2 has taken 4 of their last 8 meetings while FURIA has claimed 4.
This page provides complete coverage of the G2 vs FURIA BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.





