MIBR vs Complexity — CS2 Match BO3 at Round 2 Group A
Map Results (3 maps)
MIBR
11
Complexity
🏆 16
MIBR ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dephh | 29 | 15 | 8 | 119.9 | 44.8% | 1.76 | 85.2% |
| SicK | 23 | 15 | 3 | 79.7 | 43.5% | 1.39 | 81.5% |
| coldzera | 22 | 20 | 3 | 95.7 | 40.9% | 1.15 | 77.8% |
| ShahZaM | 17 | 17 | 4 | 68.2 | 41.2% | 1.14 | 74.1% |
| stanislaw | 18 | 16 | 5 | 76.0 | 66.7% | 1.09 | 74.1% |
| felps | 16 | 22 | 4 | 86.6 | 37.5% | 0.96 | 59.3% |
| fer | 16 | 21 | 4 | 69.6 | 50% | 0.90 | 66.7% |
| FalleN | 13 | 19 | 4 | 47.6 | 15.4% | 0.74 | 66.7% |
| TACO | 14 | 18 | 4 | 43.8 | 35.7% | 0.71 | 63.0% |
| yay | 13 | 18 | 4 | 48.9 | 30.8% | 0.69 | 59.3% |
Complexity ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
MIBR
🏆 16
Complexity
1
MIBR ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FalleN | 17 | 6 | 7 | 118.4 | 29.4% | 2.05 | 88.2% |
| fer | 17 | 10 | 3 | 103.1 | 35.3% | 1.68 | 100.0% |
| coldzera | 16 | 8 | 2 | 102.0 | 56.3% | 1.65 | 82.4% |
| TACO | 12 | 4 | 2 | 61.9 | 58.3% | 1.40 | 94.1% |
| felps | 14 | 10 | 3 | 83.6 | 35.7% | 1.39 | 88.2% |
| stanislaw | 11 | 14 | 3 | 79.1 | 27.3% | 0.77 | 52.9% |
| ShahZaM | 9 | 14 | 2 | 59.5 | 22.2% | 0.55 | 52.9% |
| dephh | 7 | 16 | 3 | 54.2 | 57.1% | 0.54 | 58.8% |
| yay | 8 | 16 | 2 | 48.0 | 25% | 0.52 | 64.7% |
| SicK | 3 | 17 | 2 | 30.8 | — | 0.15 | 29.4% |
Complexity ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
MIBR
🏆 16
Complexity
13
MIBR ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coldzera | 23 | 19 | 6 | 96.0 | 56.5% | 1.27 | 79.3% |
| felps | 22 | 17 | 5 | 76.9 | 40.9% | 1.22 | 69.0% |
| yay | 19 | 17 | 4 | 73.8 | 42.1% | 1.11 | 79.3% |
| FalleN | 18 | 18 | 5 | 71.7 | 11.1% | 1.07 | 65.5% |
| fer | 16 | 19 | 6 | 73.6 | 62.5% | 1.02 | 75.9% |
| ShahZaM | 19 | 18 | 4 | 75.0 | 31.6% | 1.01 | 69.0% |
| TACO | 14 | 15 | 2 | 48.2 | 35.7% | 1.00 | 65.5% |
| SicK | 18 | 19 | 6 | 65.9 | 72.2% | 0.97 | 69.0% |
| dephh | 18 | 22 | 5 | 61.9 | 44.4% | 0.90 | 58.6% |
| stanislaw | 14 | 17 | 2 | 50.7 | 14.3% | 0.77 | 72.4% |
Complexity ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stats recorded | |||||||
Round history not yet synced — will appear after next cron run.
Full Match Statistics
MIBR
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
coldzera |
3 | 61 | 47 | 11 | 1.30 | 97.9 | 51% | 0 | 79.8% | 1.36 |
FalleN |
3 | 48 | 43 | 16 | 1.12 | 79.2 | 19% | 0 | 73.5% | 1.29 |
fer |
3 | 49 | 50 | 13 | 0.98 | 82.1 | 49% | 0 | 80.9% | 1.20 |
felps |
3 | 52 | 49 | 12 | 1.06 | 82.4 | 38% | 0 | 72.2% | 1.19 |
dephh |
3 | 54 | 53 | 16 | 1.02 | 78.7 | 46% | 0 | 67.5% | 1.07 |
TACO |
3 | 40 | 37 | 8 | 1.08 | 51.3 | 43% | 0 | 74.2% | 1.04 |
ShahZaM |
3 | 45 | 49 | 10 | 0.92 | 67.6 | 33% | 0 | 65.3% | 0.90 |
stanislaw |
3 | 43 | 47 | 10 | 0.91 | 68.6 | 40% | 0 | 66.5% | 0.88 |
SicK |
3 | 44 | 51 | 11 | 0.86 | 58.8 | 52% | 0 | 60% | 0.84 |
yay |
3 | 40 | 51 | 10 | 0.78 | 56.9 | 35% | 0 | 67.8% | 0.77 |
Complexity
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
Roster not available — view team
Head-to-Head
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the score of MIBR vs Complexity?
The final score of MIBR vs Complexity was 2-1.
What format is MIBR vs Complexity?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Round 2 Group A.
Where can I watch MIBR vs Complexity live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for MIBR vs Complexity?
In recent head-to-head matchups, MIBR has won 5 and Complexity has won 3 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: MIBR vs Complexity
MIBR defeated Complexity with a score of 2-1 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at ESL Pro League — Round 2 Group A on May 16, 2019.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, MIBR has taken 5 of their last 8 meetings while Complexity has claimed 3.
This page provides complete coverage of the MIBR vs Complexity BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
