MOUZ vs FaZe — CS2 Match BO3 at Play-In
Match summary: MOUZ vs FaZe
FaZe defeated MOUZ 2-1 (Map 16-7, Map 10-16, Map 14-16) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Play-In on February 15, 2022.
Map Results (3 maps)
MOUZ ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| torzsi | 24 | 12 | 1 | 91.9 | 41.7% | 1.64 | 82.6% |
| NBK- | 18 | 12 | 7 | 83.4 | 72.2% | 1.48 | 87.0% |
| frozen | 20 | 14 | 2 | 92.9 | 35% | 1.47 | 87.0% |
| dexter | 20 | 13 | 3 | 85.6 | 50% | 1.38 | 78.3% |
| JDC | 15 | 15 | 4 | 73.8 | 73.3% | 1.13 | 87.0% |
| broky | 16 | 20 | 4 | 91.7 | 50% | 0.98 | 60.9% |
| Twistzz | 15 | 17 | 3 | 54.8 | 46.7% | 0.81 | 60.9% |
| rain | 16 | 22 | 1 | 74.8 | 68.8% | 0.72 | 56.5% |
| jks | 9 | 20 | 4 | 50.3 | 66.7% | 0.58 | 52.2% |
| karrigan | 10 | 18 | 3 | 56.0 | 60% | 0.57 | 52.2% |
MOUZ ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twistzz | 22 | 14 | 7 | 91.8 | 68.2% | 1.57 | 80.8% |
| karrigan | 20 | 19 | 8 | 89.4 | 35% | 1.21 | 76.9% |
| jks | 15 | 13 | 1 | 55.2 | 60% | 1.05 | 76.9% |
| dexter | 21 | 19 | 11 | 76.0 | 38.1% | 1.02 | 69.2% |
| broky | 16 | 15 | 4 | 62.9 | 37.5% | 1.01 | 65.4% |
| rain | 13 | 12 | 6 | 56.9 | 69.2% | 0.99 | 61.5% |
| frozen | 12 | 16 | 4 | 57.7 | 50% | 0.95 | 88.5% |
| torzsi | 15 | 16 | 4 | 60.1 | 26.7% | 0.90 | 73.1% |
| NBK- | 11 | 18 | 4 | 68.8 | 81.8% | 0.88 | 65.4% |
| JDC | 14 | 17 | 2 | 50.1 | 28.6% | 0.77 | 61.5% |
MOUZ ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| torzsi | 30 | 17 | 1 | 84.5 | 20% | 1.38 | 76.7% |
| jks | 26 | 18 | 5 | 97.0 | 57.7% | 1.36 | 80.0% |
| broky | 21 | 17 | 2 | 68.6 | 38.1% | 1.22 | 83.3% |
| Twistzz | 21 | 21 | 4 | 88.1 | 76.2% | 1.13 | 83.3% |
| frozen | 20 | 20 | 7 | 84.8 | 60% | 1.12 | 73.3% |
| rain | 21 | 18 | 0 | 71.7 | 52.4% | 1.03 | 66.7% |
| JDC | 16 | 21 | 9 | 86.4 | 68.8% | 1.01 | 70.0% |
| karrigan | 13 | 19 | 5 | 57.4 | 76.9% | 0.84 | 63.3% |
| NBK- | 13 | 20 | 4 | 52.6 | 46.2% | 0.80 | 60.0% |
| dexter | 14 | 25 | 6 | 42.2 | 42.9% | 0.58 | 56.7% |
Full Match Statistics
MOUZ
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 69 | 45 | 6 | 1.53 | 78.8 | 29% | 0 | 77.5% | 1.31 |
|
|
3 | 52 | 50 | 13 | 1.04 | 78.5 | 48% | 0 | 82.9% | 1.18 |
|
|
3 | 58 | 52 | 14 | 1.12 | 78.2 | 66% | 0 | 75% | 1.17 |
|
|
3 | 53 | 52 | 10 | 1.02 | 74.4 | 42% | 0 | 69.9% | 1.07 |
|
|
3 | 42 | 50 | 15 | 0.84 | 68.3 | 67% | 0 | 70.8% | 1.05 |
|
|
3 | 50 | 51 | 10 | 0.98 | 67.5 | 60% | 0 | 69.7% | 1.00 |
|
|
3 | 55 | 57 | 20 | 0.96 | 67.9 | 44% | 0 | 68.1% | 0.99 |
|
|
3 | 45 | 53 | 15 | 0.85 | 70.1 | 58% | 0 | 72.8% | 0.97 |
|
|
3 | 50 | 52 | 7 | 0.96 | 67.8 | 62% | 0 | 61.6% | 0.91 |
|
|
3 | 43 | 56 | 16 | 0.77 | 67.6 | 53% | 0 | 64.1% | 0.87 |
FaZe
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent MOUZ vs FaZe head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Group BFrequently Asked Questions
What is the score of MOUZ vs FaZe?
The final score of MOUZ vs FaZe was 1-2.
What format is MOUZ vs FaZe?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Play-In.
Where can I watch MOUZ vs FaZe live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for MOUZ vs FaZe?
In recent head-to-head matchups, MOUZ has won 4 and FaZe has won 4 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: MOUZ vs FaZe
FaZe defeated MOUZ with a score of 1-2 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at IEM — Play-In on February 15, 2022.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, MOUZ has taken 4 of their last 8 meetings while FaZe has claimed 4.
This page provides complete coverage of the MOUZ vs FaZe BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.






