What is ROUNDS's record on Ancient?
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Maps played | 59 |
| Wins | 22 |
| Losses | 37 |
| Win rate | 37.3% |
| Rounds won | 0 |
| Rounds lost | 0 |
| Round differential | +0 |
| Avg rounds won per map | 0 |
| Avg rounds lost per map | 0 |
What are ROUNDS's most recent Ancient results?
Why do Ancient stats matter for CS2 betting?
Map-specific performance is one of the strongest predictive signals in professional CS2 betting. In the Best-of-3 and Best-of-5 formats used by every Tier-1 tournament, map selection happens before the first round is played — and teams with a clear map-pool advantage beat the closing line at a noticeably higher rate than their head-to-head record suggests. Tracking ROUNDS's Ancient sample in isolation removes the noise from their weaker maps and surfaces whether they are genuinely favoured when this map hits the deciding slot in a veto.
Our database records every professional CS2 match since the source-engine transition, so the 59-map sample above represents the full competitive history rather than a rolling window that can be distorted by a single bad tournament. See the CS2 map guide for tactical context on Ancient, or check the ROUNDS team page for the full map-pool breakdown.
ROUNDS & Ancient — FAQ
Is Ancient one of ROUNDS's best maps?
ROUNDS has a weak 37.3% record on Ancient in our dataset. Expect opponents to leave this map in during veto. Compare against their strongest and weakest maps on the team page.
How many professional CS2 maps has ROUNDS played on Ancient?
Our database tracks 59 professional Ancient maps for ROUNDS, including Tier-1 tournaments, Majors, regional leagues and qualifiers. The sample excludes showmatches and unofficial events.
Does ROUNDS prefer CT or T side on Ancient?
Side-specific splits are published on the team profile once the sample size exceeds 15 tracked halves. Map-side bias is a secondary indicator; recent form across the last 3 months is typically more predictive for betting purposes.
How we build this page
Every match in our database is ingested from licensed pro-scene data feeds and validated against tournament organiser reports. The Ancient sample above is filtered to matches where ROUNDS was a listed participant and the game reached a resolved final score. Maps that ended in technical defaults or were awarded without play are excluded. Our full methodology covers how we handle roster substitutions and stand-ins, which occasionally inflate or deflate single-match ratings without affecting the long-run record shown here.
