Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC — CS2 Match BO3 at Playoffs
Match summary: Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC
Eternal Fire defeated ECSTATIC 2-0 (Map 19-17, Map 16-12) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Playoffs on May 27, 2022.
Map Results (2 maps)
Eternal Fire
🏆 19
ECSTATIC
17
Eternal Fire ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XANTARES | 33 | 26 | 8 | 116.3 | 42.4% | 1.40 | 69.4% |
| Calyx | 32 | 22 | 1 | 78.2 | 50% | 1.35 | 77.8% |
| XELLOW | 30 | 24 | 1 | 74.8 | 40% | 1.18 | 75.0% |
| woxic | 25 | 25 | 6 | 75.8 | 8% | 1.08 | 77.8% |
| Daffu | 26 | 27 | 7 | 77.1 | 38.5% | 1.03 | 72.2% |
| imoRR | 21 | 25 | 6 | 68.6 | 47.6% | 1.00 | 69.4% |
| birdfromsky | 22 | 27 | 10 | 76.3 | 4.5% | 0.98 | 69.4% |
| Staehr | 22 | 27 | 7 | 69.1 | 45.5% | 0.92 | 69.4% |
| maNkz | 22 | 29 | 6 | 68.1 | 45.5% | 0.86 | 66.7% |
| xfl0ud | 21 | 24 | 2 | 55.9 | 57.1% | 0.82 | 66.7% |
Eternal Fire
🏆 16
ECSTATIC
12
Eternal Fire ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XANTARES | 19 | 14 | 7 | 78.3 | 78.9% | 1.29 | 92.9% |
| imoRR | 21 | 20 | 6 | 94.8 | 61.9% | 1.28 | 71.4% |
| woxic | 19 | 14 | 4 | 70.3 | 26.3% | 1.26 | 85.7% |
| FASHR | 21 | 19 | 6 | 91.6 | 61.9% | 1.25 | 85.7% |
| xfl0ud | 22 | 18 | 2 | 78.9 | 45.5% | 1.12 | 82.1% |
| XELLOW | 16 | 16 | 4 | 61.6 | 37.5% | 1.04 | 75.0% |
| birdfromsky | 16 | 22 | 6 | 75.9 | 43.8% | 1.02 | 75.0% |
| Daffu | 15 | 18 | 2 | 60.3 | 53.3% | 0.92 | 75.0% |
| Calyx | 14 | 16 | 1 | 51.6 | 57.1% | 0.82 | 67.9% |
| maNkz | 13 | 21 | 1 | 49.3 | 46.2% | 0.70 | 64.3% |
Full Match Statistics
Eternal Fire
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XANTARES |
2 | 52 | 40 | 15 | 1.30 | 97.3 | 56% | 0 | 81.2% | 1.35 |
FASHR |
1 | 21 | 19 | 6 | 1.11 | 91.6 | 62% | 0 | 85.7% | 1.25 |
woxic |
2 | 44 | 39 | 10 | 1.13 | 73.1 | 16% | 0 | 81.8% | 1.17 |
imoRR |
2 | 42 | 45 | 12 | 0.93 | 81.7 | 55% | 0 | 70.4% | 1.14 |
XELLOW |
2 | 46 | 40 | 5 | 1.15 | 68.2 | 39% | 0 | 75% | 1.11 |
Calyx |
2 | 46 | 38 | 2 | 1.21 | 64.9 | 52% | 0 | 72.9% | 1.09 |
birdfromsky |
2 | 38 | 49 | 16 | 0.78 | 76.1 | 21% | 0 | 72.2% | 1.00 |
Daffu |
2 | 41 | 45 | 9 | 0.91 | 68.7 | 44% | 0 | 73.6% | 0.98 |
xfl0ud |
2 | 43 | 42 | 4 | 1.02 | 67.4 | 51% | 0 | 74.4% | 0.97 |
Staehr |
1 | 22 | 27 | 7 | 0.81 | 69.1 | 45% | 0 | 69.4% | 0.92 |
maNkz |
2 | 35 | 50 | 7 | 0.70 | 58.7 | 46% | 0 | 65.5% | 0.78 |
ECSTATIC
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
| 1.23 | Rating | 1.31 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Kills per round | 0.74 |
| 0.62 | Deaths per round | 0.54 |
| 72.4% | KAST | 76.9% |
| 1.24 | Multi-kill rating | 1.36 |
| +9.00% | Round swing | +20.00% |
| 81.7 | Average damage per round | 86.9 |
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Group CFrequently Asked Questions
What is the score of Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC?
The final score of Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC was 2-0.
What format is Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Playoffs.
Where can I watch Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC?
In recent head-to-head matchups, Eternal Fire has won 5 and ECSTATIC has won 3 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC
Eternal Fire defeated ECSTATIC with a score of 2-0 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Pinnacle Cup — Playoffs on May 27, 2022.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, Eternal Fire has taken 5 of their last 8 meetings while ECSTATIC has claimed 3.
This page provides complete coverage of the Eternal Fire vs ECSTATIC BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
