G2 vs Heroic — CS2 Match BO3 at Group B
Match summary: G2 vs Heroic
G2 defeated Heroic 2-1 (Map 7-16, Map 16-7, Map 19-17) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Group B on August 23, 2020.
Map Results (3 maps)
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeSeS | 26 | 13 | 2 | 101.3 | 50% | 1.67 | 82.6% |
| stavn | 16 | 15 | 5 | 79.0 | 56.3% | 1.28 | 87.0% |
| niko | 20 | 15 | 2 | 91.6 | 50% | 1.24 | 65.2% |
| nexa | 22 | 18 | 2 | 99.4 | 36.4% | 1.20 | 78.3% |
| cadiaN | 15 | 17 | 12 | 82.2 | 26.7% | 1.16 | 78.3% |
| JACKZ | 19 | 17 | 2 | 87.7 | 57.9% | 1.13 | 69.6% |
| b0RUP | 17 | 16 | 2 | 74.5 | 58.8% | 1.10 | 73.9% |
| huNter- | 15 | 20 | 2 | 79.0 | 53.3% | 0.89 | 69.6% |
| AmaNEk | 9 | 20 | 4 | 56.1 | 88.9% | 0.63 | 52.2% |
| kennyS | 11 | 19 | 1 | 54.3 | 18.2% | 0.57 | 43.5% |
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nexa | 28 | 10 | 2 | 109.5 | 53.6% | 1.89 | 95.7% |
| JACKZ | 17 | 10 | 5 | 69.4 | 82.4% | 1.38 | 91.3% |
| huNter- | 16 | 13 | 7 | 81.6 | 68.8% | 1.28 | 82.6% |
| TeSeS | 19 | 18 | 1 | 92.1 | 47.4% | 1.19 | 78.3% |
| kennyS | 19 | 17 | 4 | 91.3 | 47.4% | 1.14 | 69.6% |
| AmaNEk | 11 | 11 | 7 | 68.3 | 36.4% | 1.01 | 87.0% |
| niko | 13 | 17 | 2 | 57.3 | 38.5% | 0.76 | 60.9% |
| stavn | 11 | 19 | 2 | 66.8 | 27.3% | 0.65 | 52.2% |
| cadiaN | 7 | 18 | 4 | 51.0 | 28.6% | 0.56 | 56.5% |
| b0RUP | 9 | 19 | 4 | 53.9 | 55.6% | 0.56 | 56.5% |
G2 ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cadiaN | 28 | 23 | 6 | 81.9 | 17.9% | 1.19 | 69.4% |
| huNter- | 25 | 22 | 4 | 86.4 | 64% | 1.18 | 66.7% |
| b0RUP | 25 | 22 | 6 | 71.4 | 56% | 1.12 | 77.8% |
| kennyS | 26 | 23 | 1 | 73.1 | 46.2% | 1.11 | 69.4% |
| stavn | 19 | 23 | 5 | 64.7 | 47.4% | 1.06 | 77.8% |
| AmaNEk | 24 | 23 | 5 | 65.8 | 37.5% | 1.00 | 69.4% |
| nexa | 25 | 21 | 3 | 69.0 | 44% | 1.00 | 66.7% |
| TeSeS | 20 | 27 | 6 | 66.7 | 55% | 0.99 | 69.4% |
| JACKZ | 20 | 28 | 5 | 66.6 | 65% | 0.97 | 75.0% |
| niko | 24 | 25 | 3 | 67.2 | 33.3% | 0.85 | 66.7% |
Full Match Statistics
G2
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 75 | 49 | 7 | 1.53 | 92.6 | 45% | 0 | 80.2% | 1.36 |
|
|
3 | 65 | 58 | 9 | 1.12 | 86.7 | 51% | 0 | 76.8% | 1.28 |
|
|
3 | 56 | 55 | 12 | 1.02 | 74.6 | 68% | 0 | 78.6% | 1.16 |
|
|
3 | 56 | 55 | 13 | 1.02 | 82.3 | 63% | 0 | 73% | 1.12 |
|
|
3 | 46 | 57 | 12 | 0.81 | 70.2 | 46% | 0 | 72.3% | 1.00 |
|
|
3 | 50 | 58 | 22 | 0.86 | 71.7 | 22% | 0 | 68.1% | 0.97 |
|
|
3 | 57 | 57 | 7 | 1.00 | 72 | 40% | 0 | 64.3% | 0.95 |
|
|
3 | 56 | 59 | 6 | 0.95 | 72.9 | 41% | 0 | 60.8% | 0.94 |
|
|
3 | 51 | 57 | 12 | 0.89 | 66.6 | 57% | 0 | 69.4% | 0.93 |
|
|
3 | 44 | 54 | 16 | 0.81 | 63.4 | 48% | 0 | 69.5% | 0.88 |
Heroic
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent G2 vs Heroic head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Group StageFrequently Asked Questions
What is the score of G2 vs Heroic?
The final score of G2 vs Heroic was 2-1.
What format is G2 vs Heroic?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Group B.
Where can I watch G2 vs Heroic live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for G2 vs Heroic?
In recent head-to-head matchups, G2 has won 6 and Heroic has won 2 out of 8 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: G2 vs Heroic
G2 defeated Heroic with a score of 2-1 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at ESL One — Group B on August 23, 2020.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, G2 has taken 6 of their last 8 meetings while Heroic has claimed 2.
This page provides complete coverage of the G2 vs Heroic BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
