bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects — CS2 Match BO3 at Playoffs
Match summary: bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects
bankaPEPSI defeated CYBERSHOKE Prospects 2-0 (Map 13-10, Map 13-3) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Playoffs on March 28, 2026.
Map Results (2 maps)
bankaPEPSI
🏆 13
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
10
bankaPEPSI ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lUMiER | 20 | 11 | 5 | 85.7 | 65% | 1.57 | 78.3% |
| lesswill | 19 | 10 | 3 | 84.6 | 68.4% | 1.55 | 82.6% |
| xsepower | 15 | 15 | 4 | 72.2 | 26.7% | 0.99 | 69.6% |
| HUckLer | 14 | 16 | 4 | 66.3 | 85.7% | 0.98 | 78.3% |
| SEMSYS | 12 | 16 | 7 | 64.2 | 8.3% | 0.80 | 69.6% |
CYBERSHOKE Prospects ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SquEzxc | 17 | 16 | 4 | 76.2 | 64.7% | 1.49 | 69.6% |
| DAN9ARMATURA | 14 | 12 | 3 | 65.2 | 50% | 1.01 | 82.6% |
| desl3bio | 13 | 15 | 4 | 63.0 | 53.8% | 0.91 | 73.9% |
| pleynnn | 15 | 17 | 8 | 73.6 | 66.7% | 0.84 | 65.2% |
| tw1sterzaza | 8 | 21 | 7 | 52.0 | 25% | 0.44 | 47.8% |
bankaPEPSI
🏆 13
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
3
bankaPEPSI ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| xsepower | 18 | 8 | 1 | 95.9 | 50% | 1.76 | 75.0% |
| SEMSYS | 15 | 9 | 9 | 129.2 | 66.7% | 1.72 | 87.5% |
| HUckLer | 13 | 9 | 4 | 82.8 | 76.9% | 1.49 | 93.8% |
| lesswill | 9 | 6 | 2 | 41.8 | 44.4% | 1.26 | 81.2% |
| lUMiER | 10 | 10 | 5 | 68.2 | 70% | 1.25 | 87.5% |
CYBERSHOKE Prospects ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pleynnn | 14 | 12 | 0 | 94.1 | 50% | 1.07 | 75.0% |
| SquEzxc | 11 | 13 | 3 | 72.6 | 72.7% | 0.80 | 68.8% |
| DAN9ARMATURA | 5 | 12 | 2 | 41.8 | 60% | 0.72 | 62.5% |
| desl3bio | 8 | 13 | 4 | 71.2 | 87.5% | 0.67 | 62.5% |
| tw1sterzaza | 4 | 15 | 1 | 26.7 | 25% | 0.24 | 43.8% |
Full Match Statistics
bankaPEPSI
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SquEzxc | 2 | 28 | 29 | 7 | 0.97 | 74.4 | 68% | 0 | 69.2% | 1.15 |
pleynnn |
2 | 29 | 29 | 8 | 1.00 | 83.9 | 59% | 0 | 70.1% | 0.96 |
DAN9ARMATURA |
2 | 19 | 24 | 5 | 0.79 | 53.5 | 53% | 0 | 72.6% | 0.87 |
desl3bio |
2 | 21 | 28 | 8 | 0.75 | 67.1 | 67% | 0 | 68.2% | 0.79 |
tw1sterzaza |
2 | 12 | 36 | 8 | 0.33 | 39.4 | 25% | 0 | 45.8% | 0.34 |
Rosters
| 1.25 | Rating | 1.24 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Kills per round | 0.83 |
| 0.62 | Deaths per round | 0.73 |
| 72.3% | KAST | 66.2% |
| 1.25 | Multi-kill rating | 1.40 |
| +8.00% | Round swing | +10.00% |
| 87.8 | Average damage per round | 79.9 |
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Regular SeasonFrequently Asked Questions
What is the score of bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects?
The final score of bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects was 2-0.
What format is bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Playoffs.
Where can I watch bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects?
In recent head-to-head matchups, bankaPEPSI has won 1 and CYBERSHOKE Prospects has won 1 out of 2 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects
bankaPEPSI defeated CYBERSHOKE Prospects with a score of 2-0 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at CCT Europe — Playoffs on March 28, 2026. The series was played across Inferno.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, bankaPEPSI has taken 1 of their last 2 meetings while CYBERSHOKE Prospects has claimed 1.
This page provides complete coverage of the bankaPEPSI vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
