Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC — CS2 Match BO3 at Stage 2
Match summary: Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC
Ground Zero defeated Eimi Fukada FC 2-0 (Map 16-11, Map 16-13) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Stage 2 on March 18, 2020.
Map Results (2 maps)
Ground Zero ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingfisher | 26 | 19 | 5 | 101.9 | 38.5% | 1.51 | 92.6% |
| BURNRUOk | 26 | 23 | 6 | 105.6 | 61.5% | 1.31 | 70.4% |
| PEARSS | 22 | 21 | 6 | 94.6 | 31.8% | 1.18 | 74.1% |
| void | 22 | 19 | 2 | 79.4 | 36.4% | 1.16 | 74.1% |
| flaw | 21 | 20 | 8 | 84.6 | 42.9% | 1.16 | 66.7% |
| pan1K | 22 | 22 | 5 | 79.6 | 27.3% | 1.06 | 74.1% |
| val | 19 | 21 | 3 | 69.9 | 47.4% | 1.06 | 66.7% |
| pl1xx | 20 | 23 | 2 | 80.1 | 70% | 0.95 | 70.4% |
| Llamas | 13 | 16 | 3 | 43.3 | 53.8% | 0.81 | 66.7% |
| lyeN | 16 | 23 | 3 | 69.3 | 43.8% | 0.75 | 48.1% |
Ground Zero ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pan1K | 29 | 20 | 1 | 114.4 | 51.7% | 1.46 | 72.4% |
| BURNRUOk | 26 | 21 | 3 | 98.6 | 57.7% | 1.38 | 69.0% |
| Noobster | 22 | 14 | 6 | 65.0 | 13.6% | 1.36 | 79.3% |
| void | 26 | 18 | 7 | 93.0 | 50% | 1.28 | 86.2% |
| lyeN | 21 | 23 | 6 | 85.2 | 57.1% | 1.12 | 69.0% |
| Llamas | 18 | 18 | 8 | 76.5 | 50% | 1.02 | 79.3% |
| flaw | 16 | 22 | 6 | 58.7 | 62.5% | 0.94 | 75.9% |
| val | 17 | 19 | 3 | 64.0 | 58.8% | 0.88 | 65.5% |
| Kingfisher | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2.1 | — | 0.87 | 86.2% |
| PEARSS | 15 | 19 | 6 | 63.1 | 33.3% | 0.84 | 65.5% |
| pl1xx | 11 | 24 | 6 | 46.0 | 63.6% | 0.59 | 62.1% |
Full Match Statistics
Ground Zero
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1 | 22 | 14 | 6 | 1.57 | 65 | 14% | 0 | 79.3% | 1.36 |
|
|
2 | 52 | 44 | 9 | 1.18 | 102.1 | 60% | 0 | 69.7% | 1.35 |
| pan1K | 2 | 51 | 42 | 6 | 1.21 | 97 | 41% | 0 | 73.3% | 1.26 |
|
|
2 | 48 | 37 | 9 | 1.30 | 86.2 | 44% | 0 | 80.2% | 1.22 |
| Kingfisher | 2 | 26 | 23 | 5 | 1.13 | 52 | 38% | 0 | 89.4% | 1.19 |
| flaw | 2 | 37 | 42 | 14 | 0.88 | 71.7 | 51% | 0 | 71.3% | 1.05 |
|
|
2 | 37 | 40 | 12 | 0.93 | 78.9 | 32% | 0 | 69.8% | 1.01 |
| val | 2 | 36 | 40 | 6 | 0.90 | 67 | 53% | 0 | 66.1% | 0.97 |
|
|
2 | 37 | 46 | 9 | 0.80 | 77.3 | 51% | 0 | 58.6% | 0.94 |
| Llamas | 2 | 31 | 34 | 11 | 0.91 | 59.9 | 52% | 0 | 73% | 0.92 |
|
|
2 | 31 | 47 | 8 | 0.66 | 63.1 | 68% | 0 | 66.3% | 0.77 |
Eimi Fukada FC
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
| 1.33 | Rating | — |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Kills per round | — |
| 0.58 | Deaths per round | — |
| 77.8% | KAST | — |
| 1.40 | Multi-kill rating | — |
| +17.00% | Round swing | — |
| 84.6 | Average damage per round | — |
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Stage 2Frequently Asked Questions
What is the score of Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC?
The final score of Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC was 2-0.
What format is Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Stage 2.
Where can I watch Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC?
In recent head-to-head matchups, Ground Zero has won 1 and Eimi Fukada FC has won 0 out of 1 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC
Ground Zero defeated Eimi Fukada FC with a score of 2-0 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at ESL ANZ Champs — Stage 2 on March 18, 2020.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, Ground Zero has taken 1 of their last 1 meetings while Eimi Fukada FC has claimed 0.
This page provides complete coverage of the Ground Zero vs Eimi Fukada FC BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
