NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female — CS2 Match BO3 at Playoffs
Match summary: NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female
NAVI Javelins defeated CPH Flames Female 2-0 (Map 16-11, Map 22-19) in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at Playoffs on November 27, 2022.
Map Results (2 maps)
NAVI Javelins ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiyarah | 22 | 14 | 6 | 78.8 | 63.6% | 1.40 | 81.5% |
| Liina | 20 | 16 | 3 | 95.0 | 30% | 1.25 | 70.4% |
| Nayomy | 22 | 16 | 3 | 68.9 | 36.4% | 1.19 | 74.1% |
| vicuu | 16 | 10 | 8 | 55.2 | 31.3% | 1.15 | 81.5% |
| Danuu | 16 | 14 | 5 | 68.7 | 43.8% | 1.08 | 74.1% |
| Angelka | 18 | 18 | 5 | 70.4 | 38.9% | 1.04 | 59.3% |
| Hanka | 18 | 17 | 1 | 71.6 | 50% | 1.01 | 70.4% |
| ramziiN | 13 | 20 | 6 | 68.1 | 30.8% | 0.91 | 74.1% |
| Josefine | 9 | 19 | 6 | 47.3 | 55.6% | 0.71 | 63.0% |
| nayay | 9 | 19 | 2 | 48.4 | 44.4% | 0.59 | 59.3% |
NAVI Javelins ✅ Final
| Player | K | D | A | ADR | HS% | Rating | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nayomy | 37 | 32 | 14 | 102.8 | 67.6% | 1.32 | 80.5% |
| Liina | 33 | 30 | 13 | 87.7 | 45.5% | 1.30 | 87.8% |
| Qiyarah | 36 | 30 | 6 | 77.3 | 55.6% | 1.19 | 73.2% |
| Angelka | 29 | 33 | 14 | 84.7 | 44.8% | 1.10 | 70.7% |
| vicuu | 29 | 24 | 7 | 71.1 | 31% | 1.10 | 73.2% |
| Hanka | 31 | 28 | 8 | 83.1 | 64.5% | 1.06 | 65.9% |
| Danuu | 30 | 28 | 4 | 67.1 | 46.7% | 1.04 | 70.7% |
| ramziiN | 27 | 27 | 11 | 68.2 | 22.2% | 1.01 | 70.7% |
| Josefine | 21 | 31 | 8 | 66.8 | 61.9% | 0.91 | 68.3% |
| nayay | 21 | 32 | 6 | 54.6 | 52.4% | 0.70 | 63.4% |
Full Match Statistics
NAVI Javelins
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiyarah | 2 | 58 | 44 | 12 | 1.32 | 78.1 | 59% | 0 | 77.4% | 1.30 |
| Liina | 2 | 53 | 46 | 16 | 1.15 | 91.4 | 40% | 0 | 79.1% | 1.28 |
| Nayomy | 2 | 59 | 48 | 17 | 1.23 | 85.9 | 56% | 0 | 77.3% | 1.26 |
|
|
2 | 45 | 34 | 15 | 1.32 | 63.2 | 31% | 0 | 77.4% | 1.13 |
|
|
2 | 47 | 51 | 19 | 0.92 | 77.6 | 43% | 0 | 65% | 1.07 |
| Danuu | 2 | 46 | 42 | 9 | 1.10 | 67.9 | 46% | 0 | 72.4% | 1.06 |
| Hanka | 2 | 49 | 45 | 9 | 1.09 | 77.4 | 59% | 0 | 68.2% | 1.04 |
| ramziiN | 2 | 40 | 47 | 17 | 0.85 | 68.2 | 25% | 0 | 72.4% | 0.96 |
| Josefine | 2 | 30 | 50 | 14 | 0.60 | 57.1 | 60% | 0 | 65.7% | 0.81 |
| nayay | 2 | 30 | 51 | 8 | 0.59 | 51.5 | 50% | 0 | 61.4% | 0.65 |
CPH Flames Female
| Player | Maps | K | D | A | K/D | ADR | HS% | FK | KAST | Rating |
|---|
Rosters
| — | Rating | — |
|---|---|---|
| — | Kills per round | — |
| — | Deaths per round | — |
| — | KAST | — |
| — | Multi-kill rating | — |
| — | Round swing | — |
| — | Average damage per round | — |
Head-to-Head
→ Permanent NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female head-to-head archive: all-time record, recent meetings, map-by-map breakdown.
Group BFrequently Asked Questions
What is the score of NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female?
The final score of NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female was 2-0.
What format is NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female?
BO3 (best of 3 maps). Part of Playoffs.
Where can I watch NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female live?
Follow real-time scores and player statistics on this page. The match is also streamed on tournament broadcast channels.
What are the head-to-head stats for NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female?
In recent head-to-head matchups, NAVI Javelins has won 3 and CPH Flames Female has won 0 out of 3 matches. View the full head-to-head breakdown on this page.
Match Recap: NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female
NAVI Javelins defeated CPH Flames Female with a score of 2-0 in this BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match at ESL Impact League — Playoffs on November 27, 2022.
In the head-to-head between these two sides, NAVI Javelins has taken 3 of their last 3 meetings while CPH Flames Female has claimed 0.
This page provides complete coverage of the NAVI Javelins vs CPH Flames Female BO3 matchup including live map scores updated every 30 seconds, per-player statistics, round-by-round breakdowns, head-to-head history and betting odds comparison from licensed sportsbooks.
