REGISTER

Zero To Hide

APPROVED BY HEATON

  • Instant Withdrawals
  • VIP Transfer
  • Instant Rakeback
  • Weekly Cashback up to 35%

18+ · Gamble responsibly · T&Cs apply · help & info

NEO

NEO

Filip Kubski
PL 38 years
Counter-Strike 2 Plays for Lotus
0.92 RATING
per-map avg
Nickname
NEO
Real Name
Filip Kubski
Nationality
PL
Age
38
Birthday
15 Jun 1987
Team
Lotus

NEO (Filip Kubski) is a Poland professional Counter-Strike 2 player for Lotus. Career rating 0.92 · ADR 71.1 · KAST 64.0% · 894 tracked maps.

Last 10 maps ▼ Trending down

Lotus Roster

Consume Consume NEO NEO rbfurious rbfurious Sego Sego

Career Statistics

0.92 Avg Rating per map
0.86 Avg K/D ratio
15.7 Avg Kills per map
18.3 Avg Deaths per map
4.8 Avg Assists per map
71.1 ADR avg damage/round
64% KAST kills/assist/saved/traded
40% HS% headshot rate
894 Maps Played
310 Matches
14025 Total Kills
0 First Kills opening duels
Place Your Bet

ZERO TO HIDE

  • Instant Widthdrawels
  • VIP Transfer
  • Weekly Rakeback
  • Leaderboards

18+ · Gamble responsibly · T&Cs apply · help & info

Recent Match Performance 200 of 310 matches

MatchKDAADRRatingKAST
vs 9 Pandas
14 29 6 54.2 0.53 50%
vs Sangal
27 41 11 69.9 0.81 56.6%
29 41 9 67.2 0.8 59.1%
vs Illuminar
22 40 5 59.8 0.62 50%
vs PACT
45 39 13 73.6 1.12 72.1%
vs BLUEJAYS
41 55 25 60.6 0.88 69.5%
vs Illuminar
22 39 7 60.1 0.67 60.6%
vs AVANGAR
48 58 12 73.1 0.99 69.6%
vs 4glory
49 51 24 72.6 1.02 70.2%
vs AGO
54 59 26 74.9 0.98 67.9%
vs 4glory
32 54 12 52.9 0.7 58.3%
vs Ambush
46 52 25 75 0.93 61.4%
51 67 23 79.7 0.92 61.6%
vs Nexus
29 35 13 69.9 0.92 57.5%
23 44 9 58.3 0.69 61.2%
vs HONORIS
17 32 9 54.8 0.69 67.4%
vs Nexus
45 48 17 72 1.02 70.3%
vs PACT
19 34 6 55.6 0.72 56.3%
vs BLUEJAYS
52 59 18 72.9 0.96 65.5%
vs HONORIS
24 44 8 50.2 0.69 61.1%
vs B8
33 27 8 92.4 1.33 79.2%
vs HONORIS
31 45 17 59.1 0.73 62.4%
vs PACT
33 45 7 72.6 0.84 57.5%
vs ESCA
40 35 9 75.7 1.08 71.7%
vs OPAA
14 19 8 72 0.84 66.7%
vs Singularity
16 19 3 90 0.92 60.9%
vs D13
41 41 8 82.9 1.05 67.9%
vs Wisla Krakow
43 48 21 74.3 1.01 67.8%
vs PACT
50 59 25 64.5 0.92 71.9%
vs Nemiga
26 44 14 66.2 0.76 61.7%
vs Nexus
41 50 17 68.4 0.88 59.9%
vs HONORIS
48 51 22 77.6 1.09 73.1%
vs Coalesce
47 46 20 69.3 1.08 67.9%
vs Nemiga
22 41 9 58.2 0.71 60.4%
vs AGO
28 37 7 85.4 0.9 57.1%
vs Izako Boars
22 30 17 61.5 0.98 72.9%
vs Finest
26 37 11 68.3 0.75 62.5%
vs GamerLegion
11 17 2 61.5 0.71 57.1%
vs HONORIS
81 75 19 83 1.12 71.7%
vs Lilmix
43 22 13 107.9 1.58 84.8%
vs NASR
50 56 17 79.7 1.11 76.7%
vs MASONIC
36 38 11 71.4 1.07 76.4%
vs SKADE
51 62 17 70.8 0.83 60.5%
vs HONORIS
47 55 12 65.8 0.9 68%
vs bankaPEPSI
18 20 3 69.8 0.95 69%
vs HONORIS
34 54 14 56.6 0.69 61.1%
vs HONORIS
47 48 17 84.2 1.07 66.7%
vs HONORIS
53 61 30 77.1 1.09 72.1%
vs 1WIN
23 39 9 64.6 0.72 55.5%
vs MAD Lions
60 54 15 86.7 1.15 71.5%
vs HONORIS
22 32 12 53.4 0.81 59%
vs Wisla Krakow
48 57 21 83.6 1.08 70.8%
vs PACT
30 40 17 87.7 1 61.9%
vs HONORIS
22 41 9 60.7 0.65 56.9%
vs Illuminar
21 35 9 57.4 0.7 58.3%
vs HONORIS
39 49 12 61.8 0.79 56.2%
vs Wisla Krakow
50 60 24 67.2 0.95 67.2%
vs AGO
28 43 15 65.6 0.82 62.4%
vs Izako Boars
62 66 23 76.1 1 67.3%
vs Izako Boars
31 43 9 69.4 0.8 50.4%
vs Wisla Krakow
16 39 2 48.4 0.52 44.1%
vs Izako Boars
35 57 15 51.5 0.75 61.8%
vs PACT
50 45 27 74 1.15 69.5%
vs HONORIS
31 44 11 56.5 0.83 62.6%
vs Izako Boars
41 49 10 65.8 0.9 64.5%
vs Illuminar
50 58 15 67.9 0.92 61.9%
vs EC Brugge
29 28 18 67.7 1.1 75.7%
vs HERCEGNOVI
41 30 11 88.9 1.36 77.2%
vs HONORIS
24 34 11 53.6 0.78 66.2%
vs UMX
34 31 13 64.7 1.04 73.7%
vs Galaxy Racer
21 36 8 58.1 0.69 54.7%
vs Nexus
47 62 16 65.8 0.84 65.5%
vs Illuminar
41 56 20 65.6 0.91 66.4%
vs Wisla Krakow
67 55 17 89.6 1.23 72.9%
vs Pompa Team
16 21 6 55.7 0.75 56.7%
vs Illuminar
8 16 3 65 0.64 38.9%
vs AVEZ
19 8 10 94.1 1.7 94.7%
vs M1 EDEN
55 51 22 79.5 1.09 69.3%
vs StylDunow
26 39 13 80.1 0.85 58.9%
vs AGO
22 39 7 65 0.71 51.1%
vs Sinners
46 55 12 62.4 0.9 71.7%
vs PACT
34 37 6 71 0.9 57.1%
vs EXTREMUM
41 62 19 68.7 0.82 56.5%
vs Tricked
48 55 15 66.9 0.87 62.6%
vs Sangal
23 40 9 50.4 0.68 57.7%
24 40 13 68.6 0.75 51.7%
vs Lilmix
32 21 14 70.8 1.27 83.1%
vs SG.pro
30 31 8 75.9 1.19 70.9%
vs Pompa Team
54 65 22 65.9 0.89 68.1%
vs HONORIS
18 19 2 83.2 0.99 65.2%
vs Izako Boars
58 55 11 75.1 1.05 65.5%
vs Pompa Team
55 49 22 83.9 1.23 73.4%
vs Case
45 53 20 67.4 0.95 66.6%
vs ONYX
19 36 10 53.3 0.66 59.3%
vs VRTX
38 48 19 65.7 0.94 69.2%
vs Unique
18 38 7 51.9 0.59 60.3%
vs PACT
34 39 13 73.5 0.95 58.6%
vs Giants
28 38 10 60.9 0.83 50.2%
vs AGF
21 32 4 65.4 0.75 55.3%
vs Nemiga
6 20 4 55.5 0.51 56.5%
vs eSuba
44 44 6 77.5 0.97 56%
vs Secret
39 50 14 53.3 0.8 64.4%
vs HellRaisers
47 62 13 70.1 0.85 65.1%
57 50 10 79 1.23 70.5%
vs HellRaisers
24 22 5 86.5 1.17 75.9%
vs Galaxy Racer
46 59 16 68.9 0.85 60.4%
vs Nordavind
17 20 7 75.1 0.94 66.7%
vs x6tence
33 39 10 72.1 0.93 57.5%
vs AGO
13 20 1 63.4 0.6 37.5%
vs SG.pro
50 63 21 76.3 0.92 66.4%
vs AVEZ
10 17 2 61.4 0.63 61.1%
vs Tikitakan
42 38 10 85 1.13 74.5%
vs SG.pro
34 26 6 75.5 1.19 69%
vs Nordavind
18 13 6 119.5 1.59 81%
vs AVEZ
72 81 22 73.2 0.95 62.4%
vs Singularity
48 45 9 68.3 1.01 74.8%
vs CR4ZY
9 18 0 50.5 0.6 60%
vs Excellency
44 53 16 65.8 0.87 66.9%
vs GamerLegion
38 46 8 80.7 0.98 68.5%
46 50 17 76.2 1.05 69.7%
vs GamerLegion
21 42 12 51 0.62 54.6%
vs CR4ZY
37 37 6 84.3 1.06 66.3%
vs HellRaisers
12 19 2 75 0.65 50%
vs Endpoint
41 45 15 73.2 1 60.7%
34 50 14 66.9 0.77 63.3%
vs Endpoint
18 13 5 92.3 1.31 76.2%
vs Izako Boars
68 52 28 103.8 1.39 69.4%
30 44 8 69.9 0.75 64%
vs Wizards
48 53 12 78.4 1.01 65.5%
vs Apeks
54 57 15 79.8 1.04 63.7%
vs HAVU
22 38 3 70.3 0.72 56.8%
20 37 4 58.7 0.61 51.3%
vs Complexity
35 54 7 52.5 0.69 56.8%
74 74 23 84.3 1.11 76.6%
vs Illuminar
62 59 21 80.8 1.13 70.8%
vs Japaleno
21 17 6 81.4 1.23 75%
vs Wisla Krakow
54 48 12 93.7 1.2 70.6%
vs Complexity
22 34 5 64 0.85 65.4%
vs Budapest Five
30 42 7 59.7 0.77 63.3%
vs Complexity
13 12 5 86.2 1.15 72.7%
vs SAW
44 61 8 73.7 0.89 63.9%
vs Endpoint
9 17 5 56.8 0.65 60%
vs c0ntact
35 55 19 66.6 0.8 66.5%
vs forZe
19 22 2 76.2 1.04 70.4%
vs Illuminar
28 38 10 69.6 0.87 63.7%
vs FaZe
29 41 5 57.9 0.76 58.7%
36 54 12 57.5 0.78 63.5%
vs AGO
37 39 10 77.3 1.08 58.9%
vs Illuminar
51 48 7 75.1 0.99 61.8%
vs Renegades
40 50 14 65.6 0.9 67.9%
vs CR4ZY
18 18 5 81 0.97 64%
vs Vitality
18 18 2 76.2 1.01 69.6%
vs MOUZ
13 13 8 81.7 1.12 75%
vs FaZe
25 35 10 55.6 0.8 64.1%
vs NRG
23 25 12 54.6 1.01 80.9%
vs FaZe
13 20 4 53.1 0.81 70%
vs Liquid
7 16 0 37.8 0.48 45%
vs Cloud9
17 19 2 68.5 0.85 60.7%
vs Renegades
20 21 7 68.6 0.97 76.7%
vs NRG
19 18 4 90.5 1.11 68%
vs FaZe
16 40 9 46.4 0.58 60.5%
vs FaZe
23 36 8 53.7 0.65 52.8%
vs Renegades
13 21 6 46.5 0.63 56.7%
vs G2
30 40 12 66.3 0.79 65.2%
vs MOUZ
27 43 11 61.1 0.75 64%
vs North
42 50 16 60.1 0.87 65.7%
vs TYLOO
22 20 7 76.5 1.17 75%
vs FaZe
37 40 20 74.1 1 71.2%
vs G2
42 44 8 61.9 0.89 65.6%
vs FaZe
42 60 14 60 0.8 66.2%
vs FaZe
33 20 4 76.3 1.19 73.3%
vs Windigo
12 11 3 64.3 1.06 82.6%
vs OpTic
31 39 1 57.3 0.82 66.2%
vs G2
28 25 8 64.5 1.03 69.1%
vs FaZe
26 51 12 48.5 0.65 59.3%
vs Heroic
48 49 12 65.4 0.98 71%
vs Spirit
52 46 13 61.8 1.08 71.8%
27 36 14 57.3 0.8 62.8%
vs Windigo
51 62 19 65.9 0.9 61.8%
vs NRG
26 35 6 60.8 0.74 52.9%
vs Kinguin
42 35 16 87.6 1.33 82.2%
vs Liquid
10 20 3 44.5 0.59 50%
vs LDLC
16 18 2 80.7 0.94 54.5%
vs NIP
13 23 2 63.4 0.75 60.7%
vs LDLC
15 21 6 82.8 0.97 66.7%
vs NIP
20 18 1 70.8 1.05 78.6%
vs North
21 20 5 82.8 1.19 77.8%
vs North
9 20 2 62.2 0.55 47.8%
vs fnatic
23 17 7 89.4 1.28 76.9%
vs fnatic
15 22 5 69.4 0.88 62.1%
vs FaZe
23 21 6 66.8 0 0%
vs FaZe
22 11 3 102.2 1.65 76.2%
vs Astralis
19 19 4 71 1.02 70%
vs Astralis
4 19 6 43 0.48 54.2%
vs G2
12 19 3 55.2 0.62 48.3%
vs G2
9 12 3 59.1 0.88 66.7%
vs MOUZ
20 22 2 75.3 0.9 57.1%
vs MOUZ
13 19 1 66.2 0.75 43.5%
vs OpTic
27 16 3 92.4 1.34 74.1%
vs OpTic
8 18 3 55.6 0.42 35%

Recent Team Matches

ESL Challenger · Melbourne: European Closed Qualifier 2024 — Playoffs BO3
0 : 2 BO3
Lotus 0
9 Pandas 2
FINISHED BO3
ESL Challenger · Melbourne: European Open Qualifier 2024 — Playoffs BO3
1 : 2 BO3
Guild Eagles 1
Lotus 2
FINISHED BO3
ESL Challenger · Melbourne: European Open Qualifier 2024 — Playoffs BO1
0 : 1 BO1
GODSENT 0
Lotus 1
FINISHED BO1

Who is NEO?

NEO (real name Filip Kubski) is a professional Counter-Strike 2 player from PL (age 38). Currently rostered for Lotus. CS2Bet tracks every tournament NEO appears in, with map-by-map statistics and form trends benchmarked against the wider professional CS2 player pool.

What are NEO's career stats?

Across 894 tracked maps, NEO averages a 0.00 HLTV 2.0 rating, 0.0 ADR (Average Damage per Round), consistent map participation across the active circuit. For context, an HLTV 2.0 rating above 1.10 is considered Tier-1 calibre; above 1.20 is elite.

Where can I watch NEO play?

NEO plays under the Lotus banner. Their matches stream on the official tournament broadcast channel for the event they're competing in (Twitch / YouTube). Our live CS2 scoreboard updates every 30 seconds with round scores, in-match HLTV ratings and integrated betting odds.

How does NEO compare to other CS2 pros?

We benchmark every player against the full CS2 player pool of 12,000+ tracked athletes. Filter the leaderboards by role (rifler, AWPer, IGL, lurker, support) to see where NEO ranks against direct positional rivals — and review the CS2 glossary for definitions of every stat used on this page (HLTV rating, ADR, KAST, K/D, headshot %).

Explore More CS2 Content

All CS2 Players Team Lotus Player CS2 Stats Watch Live Matches

NEO FAQ

What team does NEO play for?

NEO currently plays for Lotus as a professional CS2 player. NEO represents PL in international competition.

What is NEO's CS2 rating?

NEO's career HLTV 2.0 rating is 0.92 across 894 maps played. K/D ratio: 0.86. Headshot percentage: 40%. Ratings are updated after every completed professional match.

What are NEO's career stats?

NEO has competed in 894 tracked professional CS2 maps. Career totals: 14,025 kills, 16,374 deaths, 4,332 assists. Headshot rate: 40%.

Filip Kubski, known in the CS2 scene as NEO, is a PL professional in Counter-Strike 2 for Lotus.

NEO's 0.92 career rating reflects the challenge of competing against the world's best. These figures span 894 recorded maps. A 40% headshot rate adds further context to NEO's aim profile.

Daniel Richter By Daniel Richter Lead Analyst |

Teammates

Win $100 at LuckyCoin — 5 Spots Available In CS2Bet.io Giweaway
GIVEAWAY
Win $100 at LuckyCoin — 5 Spots Available In CS2Bet.io Giweaway Total Prize: $500
Enter Now